Judgement In Supreme Court Of Canada

Default Judgement of the Supreme Court Of Canada December 2016

 

(click on the title above to view the original full sentence)


THE CURRENT JUDGMENT IS THE ONE THAT WAS OBTAINED BY DEFAULT IN DECEMBER 2016, TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, THE APPLICANTS ACTING ON THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA

(1867-1982).


Below are the letters of initiation and the response of the Supreme Court of Canada:


Monday, August 8, 2016

 To the Information Officer

Supreme Court of Canada

301 Wellington Street

Ottawa, Ontario

K1A 0J1

                                                                           BY FAX

                                                                           613-996-9138

File: 37104                            

EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES

EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY

ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER

UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN


To the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada

On October 17, 2015, the People's Grand Jury of Canada delivers its Judgment. The Grand Jury is legal, legitimate and constitutional. The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada to which all other legal provisions must conform. 

 

 Five months later ... a judgment of the Quebec court dated March 22, 2016 was declared on appeal by me, on the 30 day deadline, April 21, 2016. Proof of service. So, as long as the file is filed on the appeal, everything must stop: the other instances, seizures, threats, intimidation, harassment ...

The judgment that came out of this proceeding was June 6, 2016. I had 30 days therefore, until July 6, 2016, to register with the Supreme Court with this judgment of the Court of Appeal. What was done with the introductory motion on June 27, 2016 and the injunction filed on July 4, 2016, still on time, all the evidence in support.


When we went ourselves to file the introductory motion to the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016, I told the registry officer "we will seize our lands, our maple syrup and our property" . The agent replied:  "make an injunction" , informing me that everything must stop from the date of filing of the injunction.

But the Court of Quebec orders the bailiff to give us a notice of seizure, a writ that the bailiff came to bring to us on July 5, 2016. Therefore, the Quebec court contravenes the rules to stop the prosecution and does not respect the deadlines. , the deadline is July 6, 2016. Moreover, the judgment of the Quebec court has been appealed, everything must stop. 


On July 12th, 2 bailiffs arrive at our place accompanied by 2 police officers to take an inventory of our properties which will be listed for the seizure and auction, the sale, scheduled for September 1, 2016. The bailiffs advise me that I will receive a notice within 10 days to oppose. I received nothing, except a phone message to give me 3 options, that's all, nothing written, under which law either ...

I remind you that the motion for an injunction was filed on July 4, 2016 and that the mis en cause had 10 days to dismiss it. No objection has been filed so the injunction is valid since July 4, 2016, day of its filing.

Everything that happened after July 4, 2016, the writ of seizure on July 5, the bailiffs on July 12, the court of appeal on August 1 and the seizure scheduled for September 1, is illegal, illegitimate, unconstitutional and criminal. . It is the injunction that is predominant, which must be executed.


The Supreme Court does not answer me, does not want to interfere and does not want to confirm anything for me ... why? Does she want to ignore me and eliminate me too? Rest assured that your 1951 judgment is the main proof of this whole debate. The Supreme Court recognizes the Constitution of Canada, the BNA Act, 1867, the supreme law of Canada to which all other legal provisions must conform.


Therefore, a special emergency hearing must be scheduled for us at the Supreme Court of Canada as soon as possible, especially before the seizure of September 1, 2016, which will take away all of our equipment and machinery for our work at the cedrière, our equipment in Canada. the production of our maple syrup at the sugar shack, our native lives. 


The Supreme Court must settle this case and stop all this mental cruelty that is the treason of the Constitution of Canada, the AANB, 1867, by the national state of Quebec.


Angèle Prince

609 Route 116 East

Princeville, Canada G6L 4K6

819-364-3253


EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES

EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY

ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER

UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN


Thursday, August 25, 2016

To the Information Officer

Supreme Court of Canada

301 Wellington Street

Ottawa, Ontario

K1A 0J1

BY FAX-613-996-9138

File: 37104                            

Subject: Default judgment of 17 August 2016


EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES

EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY

ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER

UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN


To the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada

The Constitution of Canada does not belong to either the Parliament of Canada or the provincial legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is in it that the citizens of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are entitled.


Who protects us? We have no protection whatsoever.

The Supreme Court of Canada accepted - filed, the default judgment of August 17, 2016 because it had to do so. There was no opposition to the injunctions received at the registry on 4 July 2016. Nobody objected within 10 days, therefore: mandatory, valid and executive default judgment on 17 August 2016.


This is commonly done in the national state of Quebec ..


Bailiffs are calling to the Supreme Court, taunting me. The Montreal RCMP tells me it's not federal. What do you tell them about these people whose laws are not valid? To those people who manage and govern illegally? What does the Supreme Court tell me in my back?


I give you until tomorrow Friday, August 26, 2016, 3:00 pm to email me a letter signed by one of the 6 judges who are not from Quebec to confirm that the Default Judgment is valid, applicable and executive as of August 17, 2016. That the Supreme Court has the duty and obligation to respect the Constitution of Canada, the AANB 1867, the Grand Jury and the Judgment of the Grand Jury of October 17, 2015, which falls under it. And above all, that the immediate stops are respected.


The Constitution of Canada is the "supreme law of Canada" to which all other legal provisions must conform.

Otherwise, I will be at 301 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Monday, August 29, 2016 in the morning to pick up this confirmation myself, because we have no time to lose before September 1st.


Angèle Prince

609 Route 116 East

Princeville, Canada G6L 4K6

819-364-3253


EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES

EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY

ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER

UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN


BY RECOMMENDED SHIPPING


To the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada

EXTRAORDINARY REMEDY IN EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN Madam Justice Beverley McLachlin Although the Supreme Court of Canada does not give me a file number even after having followed all the procedures and filed all the required documents, the Supreme Court has the obligation to respect its own Judgment of 1951 which states:


"The Constitution of Canada belongs neither to the Parliament of Canada nor to the provincial legislatures, it belongs to the country and it is in it that the citizens of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are entitled." We are citizens of the country. The Supreme Court of Canada has the obligation to respect and execute the judgment of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada of October 17, 2015, by the people for the people, which Tribunal is legal, legitimate and constitutional. "The Constitution of Canada is the

"Supreme Law of Canada" to which any other law must conform. " Message from the Minister of Justice Canada and Attorney General of Canada, Ms. Jody Wilson-Raybould, July 8, 2016: "our judicial system is essentially based on the constitutional principle" The Supreme Court of Canada has the obligation: To cancel immediately all the proceedings of a judgment of the superior court of Quebec no. 415-17-001091-143, brought in appeal which must be heard on August 1, 2016 to the court of appeal of Quebec bearing the number 200-09-009287- 167. Immediately release our bank account frozen since July 5, 2016 from any seizure imposed by a judgment of the Quebec Court no. 415-22-006478-147, within the required time, does illegally, all evidence to the support; OF immediately cancel the seizure of all our property that must be executed on September 1, 2016; Immediately cancel all the lawsuits coming from the Federation of Quebec Maple Syrup Producers that harass us relentlessly and who are about to seize our Indian lands, our maple syrup, too, illegally; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . immediately cancel all the lawsuits from the Federation of Quebec Maple Syrup Producers who are constantly harassing us and who are about to seize our Indian lands, our maple syrup, too, illegally; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . immediately cancel all the lawsuits from the Federation of Quebec Maple Syrup Producers who are constantly harassing us and who are about to seize our Indian lands, our maple syrup, too, illegally; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . maple, too, in all illegality; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . maple, too, in all illegality; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline 

for us to receive it .


It's your only chance to escape. Angèle Prince 609 Route 116 East Princeville, Canada G6L 4K6 819-364-3253

Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers

Courage-Truth-Justice

Public Judgement

LATMP Judgement Supreme Court

 

THE CURRENT JUDGMENT IS THAT OF THE PEOPLE HAVING THE POWER OF SELF-GOVERNMENT AND JUDGMENT TAKEN AT THE RANDOM OF FREE AND VOLUNTARY HUMANS, ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA (1867-1982).

The following is a true copy, with the exception of a few spelling corrections, of the Legal, Legitimate and Constitutional Judgment of its Own Law of the High Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada.

This Judgment is valid for all: Download the PDF file (click here)

CANADA

TRIBUNAL OF THE GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA Releases the full judgment dated November 7, 2015

"Common Law Court / Customary Law"

Members of the Tribunal: Jean Paquet ... 

This Judgment is valid for all: Download the PDF file (click here)

Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers
Courage Truth-Justice
English translation is coming soon.

Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers

Courage Truth-Justice

English translation is coming soon.

image6

google auto translation from canadagrandjury.ca

Welcome to High Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada. This website is under construction.

This is an auto translate from Google with possible errors. Verified French versions can be found at www.canadagrandjury.ca. 


Courage Truth-Justice

(Virtus-Veritatis-Iustitiae)

This site is maintained by the GRAND JURY COURT OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA

-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------

Updated: April 28, 2019

--------------------------------

The Tribunal's hearings were held from June 15 to October 19, 2015:  

Auberge des Carrefours, 2 floor.

111 JJBertrand Street, Cowansville, Canada.

-----------------------------------

June 15, 2015: Random draw of Premiers-Juré.

September 19 and 20, 2015: Hearing of the cases.

October 3, 2015: Hearing of the cases.

October 4 to October 16, 2015: Proceedings of the jurors.

October 17, 2015: Reading of the Judges' Judgment, signature of the judgment.

October 20, 2015: Meaning IN PERSONNA of the signed judgment.

October 30, 2015: Judgment compliance deadline.

October 31, 2015: Until today: Public mandate (click on this link)

February 3, 2016: Official dissolution of the Tribunal, upheld the Committee / Prosecutors / Mandate / Judgment.

---------------------------------------

ACCORDING TO THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COURT OF THE GREAT JURY:

ADVERTISING IN URGENT DAMAGE BY EXTRAORDINARY REMEDY BY:

THE COURT OF THE GRAND JURY TRIBUNAL OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA:

X

AGAINST

Act respecting industrial accidents and occupational diseases.

----------------------------------------

PUBLIC NOTES OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE COURT OF THE GRAND JURY TRIBUNAL OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA:

All the action taken by the Tribunal is considered a notarial act, publicly available from the notary GHISLAIN POUDRIER, located at 430, Boulevard de l'Annonciation North, Red River, J0T 1T0, Quebec. All available from December 2015 until December 2017, for a period of two years.

This site, its full content, the participants in the Tribunal, all the evidence, and the Judgment is in full a publication in good faith, for the purpose of remedying wrongs, as a matter of urgency, by extraordinary recourse, in assistance to anyone in danger, under the law of the good Samaritan.

The Committee of the Court has decided not to collect any sums, included in the constitution of the Tribunal, and to hear completely free of charge all the cases presented at the public hearings, published on this site or in the Judgment.

Apart from the private sale of various refreshments (coffee, chocolate, etc.), with payment on the honor, during the hearings (September-October 2015), for the costs of renting the hall (which in no way covered fees), NO MONEY HAS BEEN PERCEIVED IN ANY WAY BY THE TRIBUNAL OR ITS COMMITTEE PARTICIPANTS, for its activities.

As far as possible, the opposing parties have all been duly invited by bailiff or other means to participate in the public hearings held by the Tribunal, as of the dates indicated above.

Possible amounts of money for proven harm to victims by the Judgment do not look to the Court Committee or the Tribunal as a result of the Judgment.

THE JUDGMENT IS THAT OF THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY PEOPLE, HAVING THE POWER OF SELF-GOVERNMENT AND JUDGMENT BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA (1867-1982).

REGISTRATION OF JURIES :

All the First Wurzers were randomly drawn from free human volunteers, who accepted the public mandate proposed by the committee of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, according to the Constitution of the High Court of the Grand Jury of Law common.

REGISTRATION OF CAUSES:

The court is not currently accepting any case for hearing.

FOR PUBLIC DEBATE:

Please visit  our facebook page .

https://www.facebook.com/canadagrandjury/


Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers Courage Truth-Justice

 

This page is under construction - Updated April 26, 2019

The Tribunal's hearings were held from June 15 to October 19, 2015:  

Auberge des Carrefours, 2 floor.

111 JJBertrand Street, Cowansville, Canada.

The Cause of The Grand Jury?

HOW IS THE GRAND JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA COMPOSED,? IS IT LEGAL, LEGITIMATE & CONSTITUTIONAL?

The Constitution of the Grand Jury has 64 pages, a large part of which are appendices of procedures, including the notarial procedure of the Chambre des notaires du Québec and the Rome Agreement for the description of the General States of functioning and protection aligned on the International Criminal Court.


All participants (and their families) in the activities of the People's Grand Jury of Canada are subject to international diplomatic immunity at Level 5 and are protected by the signing of the Rome Agreement by Canada.


The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, as well as all law enforcement or military forces in Canada, are required to ensure the proper conduct of the proceedings in the event of abuse of the Committee, the Court, the procedure and the conduct of the Tribunal or witnesses. The preparatory meeting for the cases in presentation aims to verify that the presenters have a cause VS the law on accidents at work and occupational diseases.


Given that the burden of proof is on the People's Prosecutor, the meeting will confirm that assistant prosecutors have a case in this area. This is for those who have already spoken with the People's Prosecutor and are not intended to limit the number of cases, but must be done because the number of cases to be presented increases very very rapidly. There will be other meetings of the same type as needed prior to the pre-hearing conference.


Here is the Committee of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada:

Founder: Denis Paiement


President of the Court: Jacques-Antoine Normandin 


Procureur-du-Peuple: Jean-Francois Fortin

 

Secretary of the Court: Michel Hardouin


This is the Court of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada


President of the Court: Vacant


Attorney-General: Jean-Francois Fortin


Special Assistant Attorney Paul Leblond


First-Jury: Poste Filled


Here is the hierarchy of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada:

-Founder of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada

-Committee of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada

-President of the Tribunal of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada
-Tribunal of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada
-Profor-of-the-People of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada
-Assistants-Prosecutors of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada
-Employees of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada

Purpose of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada:

Notarial legal authority for judgment of causes (X) versus the law on accidents at work and occupational diseases (LATMP).


The X VS LATMP case will be heard before the Grand Jury Tribunal.

The Court's Tribunal is different from the Committee. The Tribunal will have 24 First Officers, 23 of whom will be drawn at random. The President of the Tribunal is also the Chairman of the Committee.

There will be employees of the Court Committee who will be responsible for supporting the smooth conduct of the Tribunal's proceedings by performing administrative duties, research or any other function useful to the conduct of Justice.


The monetary treatment of the Committee shall be in accordance with their written brief provided by them, at the discretion of the Tribunal. The monetary treatment of the First-Juror will be $ 100 per hour. The monetary treatment of the People's Prosecutor and the Assistant Attorneys will be according to their bill of costs, at the discretion of the Tribunal. The monetary treatment of Court employees will be based on employment equity for similar positions in the federal public service. The founder does not touch monetary treatment. The monetary treatment of witnesses is equivalent to witnesses in the Supreme Court of Canada.


A grand jury is an institution within a court that has the power to conduct a formal process to investigate potential criminal conduct and determine whether criminal charges should be laid. The "grand jury" may require the production of documents and may require witnesses to appear before it to testify under oath. Currently, only the United States uses grand juries, although other common law jurisdictions have used them in the past.


A grand jury is so named because, traditionally, it has a greater number of jurors than a first jury (also known as the petty jury).


The federal grand jury is considered by the Supreme Court as "a constitutional entity of its own right" which is not part of the executive (such as prosecutors) or the judiciary (as judges, United States v. Williams 1992).


These large juries generally include a large number of members (up to 23 jurors). They make their decisions by a simple majority, and act behind closed doors, especially in order to preserve the reputation of people who have not yet been charged. In addition, there is no judge or defense lawyer before the grand jury, only the prosecutor presenting his evidence. Evidence that would be illegal at trial is admissible before the grand jury, which only pronounces on the charge without pronouncing any penalty. Major jurors may question witnesses, which jurors can not do in a trial.


The prosecutor may use the grand jury to conduct his investigation, for example to call witnesses to testify under oath. Through the grand jury, the prosecutor becomes as powerful as a French examining magistrate.


Theoretically a grand jury can act independently of a prosecutor, but it is extremely rare.


Grand jurors are usually drawn for a long time, for example, for several months.


The Constitution (version 7) of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada lacks only one article, that of the job description of the Secretary of the Court and a detail as to the minimum age of the First-Juror and the protection of the privacy of these.


This document is open to all proposals and modifications before its presentation for acceptance at the Preparatory Conference at the Court of Justice.


The public is therefore invited to comment on previously published articles  or to request by private courier a complete copy of version 7 to propose amendments or modifications to it. Version 7 is based on public ideas already received and included in the Constitution.


After the acceptance of the Constitution by the Court's Court, no amendment shall be made to the Constitution, except as described in the document, following an error of good faith.


Official language:


The working language of the People's Grand Jury of Canada is French. Given the bilingual nature of Canada, this choice does not have the effect of limiting the use of language and does not exclude participation for those who are naturally English-speakers.


The activities and decisions published in French of the People's Grand Jury Tribunal of Canada are the official versions and are the only valid and valid versions.


The Grand Jury of the People of Canada will not make any translation of its proceedings or activities for procedural, monetary and time reasons, therefore freely authorizing anyone who wishes to make the English translation, to implement the translation of its activities, for educational or informational purposes.


No translation or free adaptation of the activities or decisions is superior to the official version.


Thank you for your kind and open collaboration.


Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers Courage Truth-Justice

image7
image8

Open letter from People's Procurator to People of Canada

and to the honorable, free & open members of the People's Grand Jury Tribunal Association of Canada

 

Open letter from the People's Procurator to the People of Canada and to the honorable, free and open members of the People's Grand Jury Tribunal Association of Canada, and to all others:

First of all, thank you, thank you and thank you again for all to have believed, and for others, well ... (BEEEEP !!!), you had been warned. Then, I want to publicly ask forgiveness in front of all, since as a People's Procurator, it is my duty to inform you about the actions in court, despite the gravity of the public situation. So know that it is neither my intention nor my actions or my word to do what is being done by the brave, honorable and just action of this association made up of humans, just like you. In truth, I tell you, I would much rather be (self) locked up on my wooded lot north of the far north or in my house, without a phone, or visitors at the door, no mail and no internet with a cat on your lap and a computer mouse in your hand, and most importantly, DO NOT have to do what is being done. I told myself: while others do it for me, but for thirty (30) years or more, no one has wanted to take over his actual responsibilities for the state's (or private) crime plot. ) at this level before me, and no one has acted concretely to correct the unsustainable situation of the nominee GUY NADEAU (CA-SFPQ), owner of the national state of quebec, or his accomplices, illegally, illegitimacy and unconstitutionality. In short, in open treason against you and all the other humans of the Nation without any distinctions, against Our Queen, against our Constitution and against all the founding principles of the Country of Canada which is historically ours, willy-nilly. The social situation in general is currently critical, and without honorable quick action, becomes desperate, catastrophic ...

Therefore, by this message, my actions or words in general, or by the actions carried out within the Tribunal or the Committee, I do not wish to harm (nor obviously allow others to do). However, when continual major damage to life is observed flagrant offense, it is my duty to make clear. I must confess, ask forgiveness, because I do not like at all being doing what needs to be done, so that by conscience, moral duty, by tradition, by professional experience, by my word, oaths or personal engagements, and even by public law, I am compelled, by the force of things, to take a role, thus act honorably with others to achieve a quick, honest correction of things, or else die quickly without dignity or honor, ruined by everything that happens today in the Province of Quebec, and the Nation of Canada from coast to coast to coast. The so-called Province of Quebec, which is without doubt a part of Canada, whose undisputed leader is the Honorable Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom in Canada, by virtue of her title and heredity. Being human, unquestionably or evidence to the contrary, Canadian-French by birth, monarchist-constitutional by my political convictions, Christian by religion, military (r) member of the Royal Canadian Naval Vocational Training, by invested duty the obligation to look after the multicentennial interests, by heredity or titles, of the Head of State and the Supreme Constitution of our beautiful and rich Nation.

The one and only purpose of the Grand Jury, originally, was to self-educate as part of an unregistered free association, studying law as well as democracy in its fundamental principles, based on the current elements of society, so be able to share to all the knowledge thus acquired. Its intention is clearly established in its own Constitution, published in public domain, available to all.

The very serious findings, the findings of study or the Judgment of the Tribunal of the Grand Jury of the People are absolutely, totally, completely indefensible for some involved parties as things get worse for them, their own actions, inactions, omissions or ignoring. The gross negligence or willful ignorance of the people involved is tantamount to a plot of major fraud, with very aggravating circumstances. These people, their accomplices or collaborators must leave now, today, at this moment, without breaking anything more and without resisting unnecessarily, futilely further before the irrefutable proof of their crimes.

The Tribunal or the People's Prosecutor do not hear, have not and still do not intend to punish anyone for any reason whatsoever, but in return can not nor to remain inactive in the face of the very numerous acts prohibited in Canada, which are flagrant misdemeanor offenses by certain members of society at present, which are distributed in different commercial or public institutions. These people, unfortunately, are quite numerous and have plotted for a long time for criminal negligence, plotted for aggravated fraud without extenuating circumstances none, against all and all, committed in very organized band, over several decades and with impunity.

For three (3) years, and more particularly in the context of the hearings of the Tribunal for a year, these facts have been fully communicated in the public domain to all major stakeholders and to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The facts, acts, inactions, or omissions of these public servants are, for the most part, abuse of authority or authority of varying degrees of severity, and in many cases the acts are directly from open treason, rebellion, or coup d'etat against the legitimate government of the Province of Quebec, against other provinces or the Headquarters of the Federal Government in Ottawa, against Her Majesty The Queen or various other public institutions or large parts of society which have a major interest in the future, the public affairs of common interest or the management of the Nation in general. Many are willingly accomplices after the fact. Many have been deceived, are truly innocent, having no other choice, having been subjected or forced to collaborate, under various constraints and threats.

Despite the Constitution of Canada (in all forms), despite the long established law, despite the opinion and the wish of the people, twice in the form of popular referendum, some took advantage of historical events to succeed in diverting all or in part, the affairs of which the state is charged on behalf of His Majesty, for the living People, thus forming the Nation.

The People's Prosecutor, various First-Jury members whose names are not presently present, noted, during the criminal investigation that was given to him by Judgment, the commission on line or the continuity of very serious crimes. against the security and the state whose actions require defensive measures of equal and opposite force in an extremely urgent manner, by extraordinary recourse, in assistance to person in danger, under the law of the good Samaritan.

To the best of my knowledge or experience, without any evidence to the contrary, the instigator, the attorneys, the main stakeholders on the Committee, the first-person (randomly elected) members of the People's Grand Jury Tribunal, its employees, and me- even do not belong to any other organization, under any nominative whatsoever. Above all, these people have no intention of destroying or harming in any way the traditional basic principles of the common law of the people, the principles of justice or the tradition of the nation of Canada. . The Grand Jury Tribunal is a traditional constitutional, legal, historical, legitimate, recognized and included in the Constitution of Canada (Magna Carta Libertatum-Article 61), since 8 centuries (800 years) as shield and sword of the People against tyranny, against the abuses of the state or the abuses of the public servants. This Tribunal is the highest court of the country, point to the line, its judgments and its powerful powers are historical, verifiable, real and real. In this case, the Tribunal acts impartially and independently of the state, in the public domain. The association of public interest of study of the law automatically opens its doors to any honorable Human being who wishes freely and voluntarily to join it, subject to the Constitution of the Court. the Tribunal acts impartially and independently of the state, in the public domain. The association of public interest of study of the law automatically opens its doors to any honorable Human being who wishes freely and voluntarily to join it, subject to the Constitution of the Court. the Tribunal acts impartially and independently of the state, in the public domain. The association of public interest of study of the law automatically opens its doors to any honorable Human being who wishes freely and voluntarily to join it, subject to the Constitution of the Court.

The humans of the people are at the top. The society (the state) in charge of serving must remain STRICTLY in the role entrusted to it by the people, or else desist, before having to answer for their actions. The People's Grand Jury Tribunal of Canada, through my written hand, thanks everyone, from first to last, everywhere and at all times. We are here, we watch.

Government is BY CONSENT, or not at all. The Free Association of the People's Grand Jury Tribunal of Canada studies the state as a whole, denouncing crime, injustice or inequality, seeking redress or correction in a lawful, legitimate and constitutional way in the context of Representative Democracy and the Constitutional Monarchy. We do not wish to harm or gain benefits over others. We have honorable, peaceful, public and open intentions to all debates. Any statement to the contrary will have to be duly proven by the party claiming it and the position described in this message will face the appropriate defense that is already public and proven. At the end, we charge our work autonomously and we will claim the things that will be due in order to obtain Justice and the end of the abuses. We act under the severe and continuous threats and constraints of perpetrators who do not stop or acknowledge their active or passive participation in the major conspiracy that is currently in court for all to see.

I, undersigned, Jean-Francois Fortin, People's Procurator for the Tribunal of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, ask only one thing, in a personal way, to anyone who can or will, to prove to me that I am wrong. Please judge public documents, not my dirty character or my human situation, because I only want to give up and withdraw from society as it is at the moment, but I have no choice, it is live worthily or die in lies and dishonor. Above all, I want to preserve social peace and life under the banner of truth. Thank you for your attention and your understanding on the subject, in my name Clean.

-I became the destroyer of the world. JR Openheimer, shortly after the first atomic explosion.

LONG LIVE FREEDOM.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN.

Courage, truth, justice.
Jean Francois Fortin
Prosecutor del Popolo.

Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers

Courage Truth-Justice

image9

VIDEO PRESENTATIONS OF PUBLIC HEARINGS

These YouTube channels host the public hearings held by the Tribunal



However, for more mental comfort you can look in chronological order, by day, below:


NOTA BENE: some sequences of less than two minutes have not been published, have however been preserved in archives, and broadcast live.


CALENDAR OF THE GRAND JURY TRIBUNAL OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA:


Preparatory or subsequent meetings



Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers

Courage Truth-Justice

Learn More

These two YouTube channels host the public hearings held by the Tribunal, but the sequences are not published in the order. So it's very difficult to follow all Tribunal hearings on these channels. 

PUBLIC MANDATE

The People's Grand Jury Tribunal of Canada: Mandate:

 

CANADA, 

November 7, 2015

The People's Grand Jury Tribunal of Canada: Mandate:
the prosecutors, under the authority of the Tribunal and the People, above named in this Judgment, to conduct a criminal investigation, serious and severe, for the facts mentioned above by all means useful and necessary to prevent crime, such as are the equivalent powers of a judge of instruction in law of France.


Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers

Courage Truth-Justice

Many participated

Many participated

image10

CONSTITUTION OF COURT OF GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA

The French version can be downloaded by clicking the image above

This is a long form text area designed for your content that you can fill up with as many words as your heart desires. You can write articles, long mission statements,  

CONSTITUTION OF THE COURT OF

GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA

TITLE I

GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA:

Article 1

CONSTITUTION:

This document is the Constitutional Statement of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada. The current Constitution is the foundation, scope, scope and authority of the Founder of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, the Court Committee and the Court of the Court.

Hereinafter, may be called Grand Jury, or Grand Jury of the People of Canada as equivalent;

Article 2

VALUE :

Without limits: the compassionate Conscious Life offered by the Creator of the Universe;

Article 3

FORM:

Free private association of study of public interest of common law and customary law, UNDER EMERGENCY MEASURE BY EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES;

Article 4

AUTHORITY:

The compassionate Consciousness Given Life offered by The Creator of the Universe to his Creatures born human, heirs of the Earth, endowed with free will and power of self-government;

Article 5

JURISDICTION:

The Common Law / Customary Law of the People of Canada. No law is above the customary rights of the people of Canada;

Article 6

EQUIVALENT POWERS AND APPLICATION:

Common Law, Customary Law, The Supreme Court of Canada; Canada 1982 Act in the generally accepted territory of the place known as Canada;

Article 7

SOCIAL REASON :

Study of the legality, the legitimacy, the responsibilities, the application and the constitutionality of the law on accidents at work and occupational diseases issued by the "parliament of the state of québec";

Article 8

GOAL :

Life by the enhancement of social peace in application of the common law / customary law of the judgment of justice;

Article 9

MANDATE:

Maintain social peace, by application of common law and customary law;

Article 10

FOUNDER OF THE COURT OF THE GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA:

The Founder of this Constitution, in its totality, is the private and unique creator and owner of the private association. As such, it also has powers of dissolution. The Founder has all the powers written in the present. The Founder chooses the members of the Court at his sole discretion. It must obligatorily act in the following way:

Article 11

MANDATORY DELEGATION-FOUNDER:

With the exception of the power to dissolve, The Founder of the Free Private Association of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada is obligatorily and voluntarily to delegate this Constitution to the Committee of the Court, as described or limited by the present Constitution of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada:

Article 12

MANDATORY DELEGATION-COMMITTEE OF THE COURT:

With the exception of the power to dissolve, the powers of the Committee of the Court as well as the powers regarding the application of the operating procedures of the Tribunal, The Committee of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada must mandatorily delegate to the Tribunal of the Court, without prejudice, all of its powers of judgment, hereby conferred immediately upon its creation, as hereby made or limited. After the acceptance of the Constitution by the Tribunal, the Tribunal establishes the Tribunal's powers of judgment;

Article 13

MANDATORY DELEGATION-PROCESSOR-OF-PEOPLE:

With the exception of Pleadings as well as Closing, Power of Attorney and the presentation of the Lighthouse Cause of the Creator of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, the People's Procurator will It is mandatory to delegate its powers of presentation of cases, as well as the associated powers, to Assistant Public Prosecutors. The number of mandatory delegations will be equivalent to the number of cases that wish to be heard by Tribunal members;

Article 14

TRUST-FOUNDER:

The private free association of the People's Grand Jury Court of Canada is a trust based on trust. The Founder hereby delegates his powers to the Committee of the Court appointed, unilaterally, by him.

The mandatory delegation of powers of the Founder (beneficiary) is trustee of trust to The Court Committee.

Article 15

TRUST-COMMITTEE OF THE COURT:

The private free association of the People's Grand Jury Court of Canada is a trust based on trust. The Committee of the Court (beneficiary) delegates its powers to the Court of the Court appointed, by random drawing, by him.

The mandatory delegation of powers of the Court's Committee is a fiduciary of trust towards the Court of Justice.

Article 16

TRUST-HIERARCHY

The trust trusts thus created by the current Constitution are disolvable by the higher beneficiaries only by withdrawal of trust at all times. Thus, the delegated administrators of dependent powers can not become independent of their superior parent, based on trust and are obligatorily bound by the present trust.

Article 17

COMMITTEE OF THE COURT-MEMBERS:

The Committee of the original Court is chosen by the volunteers unilaterally by the Founder of the private free association of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada.

The Committee of the Court is deemed to be the leader of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada is constituted under a two-third (2/3) majority vote, in front of the totality of the members of the Committee.

The Committee of the Court is three members. The Committee of the Court votes the positions of its members behind closed doors. The Committee of the Court elected, in camera, a President, a People's Procurator and a Secretary;

Article 18

COURT ROLE COMMITTEE:

The Committee of the Court is the private forum of the People's Grand Jury of Canada and is not required to report to anyone outside the association, except as described in the current Constitution.

The Committee of the Court drafts, behind closed doors, and votes on this Constitution of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, which will be submitted for final acceptance to the Court's Pre-Trial Conference. The validity of the Constitution of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada is subject to a simple majority vote of the members of the Court of Justice after its establishment.

The Committee of the Court establishes the Court's Court and draws the random draw of the First-Juries, as well as the Jurors-Reservists, from among the list of potential members.

All votes on matters referred to the Committee of the Court shall be held in camera, two-thirds (66%) of all members of the Committee of the Court. The Court of Justice does not have the right to vote on questions submitted to the Court Committee, subject to the compulsory delegations contained in the Constitution.

After the selection of the randomly selected candidates, in camera, by the Committee of the Court, the result is presented for acceptance at the preparatory conference of the Court of Justice. The First-Jurors and the Jure-Reservists drawn at random are appointed by the Committee of the Court as members of the Court's Court.

The Committee of the Court does not have jurisdiction over the final acceptance of the Constitution of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada. The final acceptance of the present is submitted by the Committee of the Court, before the twenty-three First-Juries, to the preparatory conference of the Court of Justice, after its creation by the Committee. The Tribunal, in a preparatory conference, accepts or refuses, by simple majority vote, the validity of this Constitution which establishes its powers.

Article 19

COURT TRIBUNAL - RASH OF THE RULES:

A public list listing of First Judges and Resident Juror-members is initiated by the Court's Committee. A list of free volunteers is drawn up for random draw. The Committee of the Court does not know the registration information, except for the total number of registrations.

The registration list will be open for thirty (30) consecutive days. The list will be closed and permanent thereafter.

Volunteer registration requirements include their name, email address or a valid phone number. Only random drawers will be informed of the draw results, subject to their acceptance.

The Committee of the Court must delegate the creation of a secret list of registrations to a person appointed by him. The Committee of the Court does not have jurisdiction over the establishment or maintenance of the list. The person in charge of the random draw list is subordinate and is considered an employee of the Court Committee. Potential members of the Court's Tribunal are randomly drawn by the Court's Committee.

Volunteers, subject to this Constitution, are appointed, in the order of draw, by the Committee of the Court as First-Jury or as Additional Juror-Reservist, to ensure the continuity of the work in case of absence of Premier-Juror.

The entries on the list for the random draw are free and voluntary. A private website is available for the establishment of the list. The draw is done in the simplest way desired by the Committee of the Court. A number of Premier-Juror is assigned to each draw. The President of the Tribunal is assigned number one (1). Numbers two (2) to twenty-seven (27) are awarded in the order of random draw for each of the First-Juries and for the Jure-Réservistes.

After the random drawing, the candidates are appointed, subject to the Constitution of the People's Grand Jury of Canada, by the Committee of the Court as members of the Court of the Court.

Registration is for the random draw of twenty-three (23) First-Juries and three (3) Jure-Réservistes. The expenses of all Jurors will be reimbursed according to the Constitution of the Grand Jury. Registration is free. No experience in law is necessary.

The registration deadline for potential Jurors is thirty (30) days to register on the draw to be a member of the Tribunal. The list will be closed at registration after this deadline and will become permanent to the activities of the Grand Jury. The list thus constituted is private to the Court of the Grand Jury. The opening date of the list is fixed by the Committee of the Court.

The entries selected for the random draw are verified by the person delegated by the Committee of the Court in charge of drawing lists.

Article 20

TRIBUNAL OF THE COURT-MEMBERS:

The Court is the public forum of the People's Grand Jury of Canada and is not required to report to anyone outside the association, except as described in the current Constitution.

The Court of the Court is a dependent party of the Committee of the Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, therefore under the jurisdiction and authority of the Court Committee. The members of the Tribunal are twenty-three First-Juries with three Juries-reservists. Members are drawn at random, in camera, by the Court's Committee;

Article 21

COURT OF ROLE COURT:

The Constitution of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada is presented to the Court of Justice for submission to the simple majority vote of the Tribunal. The Court of Justice does not have the jurisdiction to draft the Constitution of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada. The Tribunal, accepts or refuses under a vote, the validity of this Constitution which establishes its powers.

The Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada will submit, for judgment, to the Court of Justice the study of the legality, the legitimacy, the responsibilities, the application and the constitutionality of the law on accidents at work and occupational diseases issued by the "parliament of the state of Quebec";

Tous les votes sur les questions soumises au Tribunal sont obtenus par résultats à la majorité simple, soit cinquante-et-un pourcent(51%) de vingt-trois(23) Premiers-Jurés. Le Président du Tribunal n'as pas le droit de vote sur les questions soumises au Tribunal.

Article 22

TRIBUNAL DE LA COUR-MEMBRES POTENTIELS :

Tout humain né conscient doté de libre-arbitre et de pouvoirs d'auto-gouvernement dans le territoire admis généralement du Canada, incluant les immigrants reçus légalement, inscrit librement et volontairement sur la liste du tirage au hasard à l'exception de ce qui suit :

Article 23

TRIBUNAL DE LA COUR-PROSCRIPTIONS :

Afin de préserver l'intégrité de l'activité ou les procédures du Grand Jury du Peuple du Canada;

Par décision à l'unanimité du Comité de la Cour, les membres actuels ou passés du barreau du Québec sont proscrit des activités de la Cour ou du Tribunal pour cause de conflit d'intérets aggravé.

Par décision à l'unanimité du Comité de la Cour, les membres actuels du gouvernement de l'état du Québec sonts proscrits des activitées de la Cour ou du Tribunal pour cause de conflit d'intérets aggravé.

Par décision à l'unanimité du Comité de la Cour, les membres du Comité de la Cour, les employés de la Cour ou le Fondateur du Grand Jury du Peuple du Canada sont proscrits de s'inscrire pour les tirages au sort du Tribunal de la Cour.

By unanimous decision of the Committee of the Court, the person entrusted by the Committee with the establishment or maintenance of the list of random draw for the causes or for the Jurors is prohibited to be inscribed on the list, or for other activities of the Court or Tribunal.

By unanimous decision of the Court Committee, legal persons, private interest organizations or corporations are prohibited from registering or registering representatives for the activities of the Court or Tribunal.

By unanimous decision of the Committee of the Court, the People's Prosecutor, the Secretary, the Assistant Prosecutors drawn at random can not be a member of the Tribunal or participate in the draw.

By unanimous decision of the Committee of the Court, the previous decisions do not include the witnesses who will be summoned by the Court or the Tribunal for hearing.

By unanimous decision of the Committee of the Court, the previous decisions do not include the employees of the Court for its activities or procedures. These decisions do not include the free forum or public forum of the Tribunal made available to the public. These decisions do not have the effect, in the event of an unforeseen breach, of endangering the Court or the Tribunal or of terminating its activities or procedures.

Article 24

TRIBUNAL OF THE COURT-COMPOSITION:

The number and composition of the members of the Court of Justice is established according to the conditions laid down in the current Constitution.

The total number of members of the Court of Justice is twenty-seven (27) persons.

The President of the Tribunal is determined by the position of President of the Court Committee. The President of the Tribunal is not drawn at random. The President of the Tribunal is a First-Juror. The number of First-Shots drawn at random is twenty-three (23) aditiés:

Three (3) Jure-reservists, drawn at random, to continue smoothly, the work of the Tribunal in case of absence, for some reason of a First-juror. The random draw is made according to the same list and conditions of First-jurors;

Article 25

TRIBUNAL OF THE COURT-RESERVE OF JURY:

All non-randomly selected applicants will remain on the reserve list if necessary for the duration of the activities or proceedings of the People's Grand Jury of Canada.

At any time, in order to continue the activities or procedures of the People's Grand Jury of Canada, the Committee of the Court may use the reserve on the list of potential candidates or the Jurors-Reservists in order to complete the list of members of the Tribunal in any breach of this Constitution.

The Committee of the Court so named replacement for default to any First-Jury, for some reason. A juror-reservist thus named becomes a first-juror.

Article 26

TRIBUNAL OF THE COURT-HEARD CAUSE

The cases heard by the Court of the Grand Jury of the People's Court of Canada will have to be against the law on accidents at work and occupational diseases.

All other case registrations are prohibited and will be removed from the list in the event of an abuse of registration. The merits of the case are heard at the public hearings of the Court of the Court.

The Court of First Instance decides at the pre-hearing conference whether the case heard is appropriate, on the recommendation of the President. The President is not required to obtain this consent to implement the procedure;

Article 27

COURT TRIBUNAL - RANDOM CHALLENGING CAUSES

A public list of registrations for Tribunal members is initiated by the Court's Committee. A list of causes is established for random draw. The Committee of the Court does not know the registration information, except for the total number of registrations.

The registration list will be open for thirty (30) consecutive days. The list will be closed and permanent thereafter.

The conditions for registering causes include their name, an email address or a valid phone number. Only random drawers will be informed of the draw results, subject to their acceptance.

The Committee of the Court must delegate the creation of a secret list of registrations to a person appointed by him. The Committee of the Court does not have jurisdiction over the establishment or maintenance of the list. The person in charge of the random draw list is subordinate and is considered an employee of the Court Committee. Cases heard by the Court are randomly drawn by the Court's Committee, in camera.

The causes, subject to this Constitution, shall be named, in the order of circulation, by the Committee of the Court.

The entries on the list for the random draw are free and voluntary. A private website is available for the establishment of the list. The draw is done in the simplest way desired by the Committee of the Court. A cause number is assigned to each draw. The leading cause of the Founder is assigned number one (1). The two (2) and subsequent numbers are awarded in random order for each cause.

After the random draw, the named cases are heard, subject to the Constitution of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada, by the Court's Court;

A case is considered scheduled for hearing AFTER the random draw and verification of the applicant's acceptance. The number of cases heard will depend on the Tribunal's decision. Attorneys from random cases will be able to present their bill of costs to the Tribunal. No experience in law is necessary.

The time for cases is thirty (30) days to register in order to present a case before the Tribunal. The list will be closed at registration after this deadline and will become permanent to the activities of the Grand Jury. The list thus constituted is private in the Court of the Grand Jury. The opening date of the list is fixed by the Committee of the Court.

Registrations of cases from the random draw are verified by the delegate of the Court Committee responsible for drawing lists.

Article 28

COURT TRIBUNAL-PROCEDURES:

The Tribunal uses, for its procedures, an amended version of the notarial arbitral procedure published by the Quebec Order of Notaries-Arbitrators;

The Tribunal will be able to secure voluntary services for positions that will be required for the proper conduct of the proceeding. As a procedural power, this decision may be subject to the recommendations deemed necessary by the President of the Tribunal for acceptance by the members of the Tribunal. The President is not required to obtain this consent to apply the procedure.

Article 29

COURT OF THE COURT-PROCESSOR-OF-PEOPLE:

The People's Prosecutor is a member of the Court's Committee and may appoint as many assistant public prosecutors as he deems necessary for the proper conduct of the proceedings. Assistant Prosecutors will present their private cases to the Court of Assisted Court of the People's Prosecutor.

The People's Prosecutor appoints assistant prosecutors based on the random drawing of cases. Applicants for random cases may self-represent or name whoever they represent to their exclusive unilateral decision.

The People's Procurator does not have the power to refuse to appoint an assistant attorney, nor does he have the power of attorney over random causes.

It is the duty of the People's Prosecutor, or assistant prosecutors, to submit their bill of costs for reimbursement by the unsuccessful party. The bill of costs will be submitted to the Tribunal as an integral part of the judgment.

It is the duty of the Attorney-General to support and facilitate the presentation of random cases, but is in no case a substitute for the absence of the plaintiff or assistant prosecutor.

It is the duty of the People's Prosecutor to share and understand the procedures for bringing cases before the Tribunal, as described in sections 46 and 47, below;

Article 30

COURT TRIBUNAL WAIVER OF THE PEOPLE'S PROSECUTOR:

The People's Procurator does not give legal advice. It does not provide power of attorney, or costs related to the presentation of causes drawn at random, other than the Lighthouse Cause of the Founder of the Grand Jury Court.

Article 31

COURT OF POWERS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES:

At the hearings of the Court of the Court, the President will retain his powers for the Constitution of the Court, for the procedure and conduct of the proceedings only. These powers can not be delegated or substituted, and it is the responsibility of the President to enforce order with the Tribunal and the Court.

Article 32

COURT OF THE FRESH COURT AND ADMINISTRATION OF EXPENSES:

The unsuccessful party bears the costs. All other expenses are also borne by the unsuccessful party. The cash amounts collected by the Court will be locked in a trust account under notary audit.

Article 33

COURT TRIBUNAL - CONDITIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF A CAUSE:

The amount of registration of a case for judgment before the Court of First Instance is set at one hundred and four (104) dollars and the presentation of two names of potential First-Jurors for the draw of the members of the Tribunal. Only cases heard by the Tribunal will be subject to the registration amount.

Les personnes inscrites sur la liste du tirage au hasard des jurés par les causes inscrites pour jugement ne peuvent être tirés deux fois. Si un Juré est tiré au hasard une deuxième fois comme présentateur de cause, son nom sera rayé da la liste des jurés, il sera remplacé par un Juré-Réserviste, et un nouveau Juré-Réserviste sera tiré au sort de la réserve.

Les causes qui seront entendues sont tirées au hasard. Une cause inscrite sur la liste de tirage ne sera pas nécéssairement choisie par le tirage. Une cause tirée au hasard ne sera pas nécéssairement entendue par le Tribunal. Le nombre de causes entendues est à la discrétion du Président du Tribunal ou des membres du Tribunal.

The files must be submitted to the President of the Tribunal by the parties wishing to present their case in hearing. The president, after the draw of the cases, can decide without the opinion of the Tribunal, if a case is not related to the activities or procedures of the Tribunal and he can reject it unilaterally. A cause is also called a request.

After the random drawing of the cases: the application, the evidence and the evidence are prepared and presented by the party who makes the request to the President of the Tribunal for a hearing before the Tribunal. Parties requesting such assistance may be assisted by the People's Prosecutor in preparing for the presentation to the Tribunal.

Article 34

COURT COURT-ARCHIVES:

All cases presented must have a copy on file with the Tribunal. Any records or archives of the Court or Tribunal will be kept in the public domain by a notary public officer for consultation at all times by the public. After the acceptance of the Constitution by the Tribunal, all archives will be made available to the public after publication decision.

Article 35

TRIBUNAL OF THE COURT-PRESIDENT:

The President of the Court is also the President of the Tribunal. At Tribunal hearings, the President will retain his powers for the Constitution of the Court, for the purposes of the procedure and to ensure the proper conduct of the proceedings only. The monetary treatment of the President shall be one hundred (100) dollars per day. By unanimous decision of the Committee of the Court, the President of the Court shall defer his powers of judgment to the Tribunal, retaining only those of the President of the Tribunal, as described below:

Article 36

JURY MEMBERS OF THE TRIBUNAL-ROLE:

Power of trial of cases delegated to the First-Juries by the Committee of the Court.

All procedural powers are at the discretion of the President of the Tribunal or his delegated committee, according to the Constitution.

Article 37

TRIBUNAL OF THE COURT LEGALITY:

All the activity of the Court of the Court is legitimate, registered and public. All activities of the Court or Tribunal are notarized, this includes all future activity as well.

The adverse party having been duly informed, does not wish to voluntarily participate in the proposed judgment, all activities and procedures are legally at the discretion of the plaintiff, the Founder of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada.

Article 38

COURT OF THE COURT-PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION

All proceedings, hearings, testimony, proceedings or proceedings of the Court of the Court will be broadcast live on the Grand Jury of Canada website. All decisions will be of public interest.

At Tribunal hearings, a public forum for free witnesses will be scheduled. A written forum of questions will also be made available to the public. All free testimonies and relevant public comments collected in this way may be presented to the Tribunal.

The free forum and the written forum will not be used as a direct result of a case presented at random for the Tribunal's judgment, but may be additional evidence to the Tribunal's final decision. The Tribunal is not required to present, take into account or hear such evidence in rendering a decision.

Article 39

COURT TRIBUNAL-QUESTION TO JUDGMENT:

La cause avec préjudice: X VS. LATMP sera entendue devant la Cour et le Tribunal est réalisée SOUS MESURE D'URGENCE PAR RECOURS EXTRAORDINAIRE. La question soumise au jugement du Tribunal est: est-ce que la LATMP est valide et appliquée?

Basé sur la question principale, le Tribunal doit également étudier les codes ou autres formes de législations qui sont associés.

Article 40

TRIBUNAL DE LA COUR-LEGITIMITE :

Le jugement du Tribunal du Grand Jury du Peuple du Canada pourra émettre des recommandations de droits légitimes aux employés du gouvernement de l'état du québec, s'assurer de la validité de la loi sur les accidents du travail et les maladies professionnelles, ou émettre des constats d'infractions pour d'éventuelles accusations d'autres natures dans le cas ou la loi ne serait pas légitimement appliquée. Les décisions du Tribunal peuvent être éxécutoires et définitives, sans appel à la discrétion de la Cour.

Article 41

GRAND JURY DU PEUPLE DU CANADA-CAUSE PHARE :

La Cause-Phare est la cause de la fondation et de l'initiative du Fondateur Denis Paiement. La Cause-Phare est totalement indissociable de l'existence du Grand Jury du Peuple du Canada.

The Grand Jury of the People of Canada is Denis Paiement's unique and unique private initiative. The Cause-Phare Denis Payment is not subject to random draw and must be heard by the Court of Justice for judgment and decision.

Hearing the Lighthouse-Cause includes full written writing of a Tribunal decision for final settlement. The decision of the Tribunal's judgment at the Cause-Phare is applicable to all the other cases presented and drawn at random and all the other claims in the general case X versus the law on industrial accidents and occupational diseases.

Article 42

GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA-LEGITIMACY

The other party is the law on industrial accidents and occupational diseases, legally applicable under the mandate of the Government of the State of Quebec by the Commission for Health and Safety at Work, hereinafter perhaps called the opposite party. defendant or defendant.

Following the abandonment of the defendant, the judgment of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada may issue recommendations for the application of legitimate rights or ordinances to employees of the Government of the State of Quebec or under mandate, as the case may be

Following the abandonment of the defendant, the judgment of the Grand Jury of the People must ensure the validity and legitimacy of the law on accidents at work and occupational diseases, may issue recommendations for the application of legitimate rights or ordonance ... continued here  USE GOOGLE CHROME TRANSLATE

Learn More

This is a content preview space you can use to get your audience interested in what you have to say so they can’t wait to learn and read more. Pull out the most interesting detail that appears on the page and write it here.