COURAGE - TRUTH - JUSTICE / COURAGE - VÉRITÉ - JUSTICE
The State of Justice in Canada
Royal Public Society of Canada
A number of individuals have shared with us their personal account of challenges they have faced with the current justice system here in Canada. People reach out to anyone who may be able to provide a solution to the situation in which they find themselves embroiled in, often through no fault of their own. While we are not in a position to offer remedy to these individuals, we are able to comment on the current judicial system and how the delivery of justice is contrary to the Constitution Act 1867-1982.
Here is a capture from a Supreme Court Case which was filed in 2017, S.C.C File No. 37325 This verifies the authenticity.
This is a snapshot from the affidavit from a retired RCMP officer, admitting that there is serious corruption within the justice system between judges, lawyers and court staff, involving payoffs, bribery and case fixing.
This corruption frees criminals from accountability to their crimes, but it also allows for the framing of innocent individuals to the favor of criminals. This is contrary to the Constitution Act.
Let us start with Article 52 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, taken directly from the constitution act. The constitution is the supreme law of Canada, meaning that no other law, which is contrary or inconsistent with what is stated in the constitution, has no effect.
Primacy of Constitution of Canada
· 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Article 32 of the Constitution Act 1867-1982 explains that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms applies to the Parliament and to Government. It does not apply to people outside of the government who have no contract with the government, meaning average citizens. It is the supreme law and the responsibility of the government or anyone who works on behalf of the government to ensure that these fundamental freedoms are upheld.
Application of Charter
· 32. (1) This Charter applies
o (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
o (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
The legal rights for individuals are laid out in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The government must ensure that these rights are protected for individuals as outlined in the constitution Act 1867-1982.
Legal Rights
Marginal note: Life, liberty and security of person
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
Marginal note: Search or seizure
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
Marginal note: Detention or imprisonment
9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.
Marginal note: Arrest or detention
10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention
· (a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
· (b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and
· (c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpusand to be released if the detention is not lawful.
Marginal note: Proceedings in criminal and penal matters
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
· (a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
· (b) to be tried within a reasonable time;
· (c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;
· (d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;
· (e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;
· (f) except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;
· (g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;
· (h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and
· (i) if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.
Marginal note: Treatment or punishment
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
Marginal note: Self-crimination
13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.
Marginal note: Interpreter
14. A party or witness in any proceedings who does not understand or speak the language in which the proceedings are conducted or who is deaf has the right to the assistance of an interpreter.
How is it possible that the government is ensuring these rights for the citizens of our country when a case like the one mentioned at the beginning of this article are being heard and being dismissed from our court systems, with no accountability to the individuals who are implicated in the corruption. There are so many instances, documented in our court system, whereby individuals are not being granted the constitutional rights to which they are entitled. Individuals’ fundamental freedoms are eroded to the point that there is no faith in our current justice system.
The Royal Public Society of Canada has adopted the Constitution Act 1867-1982 as the guiding document for the society and will endeavor to uphold the individual rights and freedoms that Canadians expect. The Royal Public Society of Canada will also recognize the validity of the Magna Carta and the return of common law to our court systems. Our mission statement offers the following:
Law and Justice
The SRPC will immediately reinstate, according to the Canada Act 1982, c. 11 (UK), or before, the King's Bench and the People's Grand Jury according to the tradition or custom of the People of Canada. Both instances are superior in fact and in law, above any other state court, directly under the authority and jurisdiction of the Sovereign of Canada. This is an important legal measure of protection essential for the People of Canada against tyranny. This, through the full responsibility of the Department of Justice Canada, as soon as possible after compliance with the Canada Act 1982, c. 11 (UK). The formation of both of these tribunals, currently non-existent, is under the sole discretion of the decision of the S.R.P.C. The conditions for recovery of such tribunals remains to be established in practice, which will subsequently be communicated.
This is the only way that we can return to a just society where the misdeeds of criminals do not go without consequence and where innocent individuals cannot be unjustly embroiled in false accusations. The common law method of justice is the only way to grant the citizens of our nation trust in the courts, and in the process that ensures their fundamental rights are adhered to and maintained with confidence. A broken system cannot be repaired with more of the same weak processes. Only a new fresh system of justice will ensure that we can move forward with confidence.
Public Judgement
LATMP Judgement Supreme Court
THE CURRENT JUDGMENT IS THAT OF THE PEOPLE HAVING THE POWER OF SELF-GOVERNMENT AND JUDGMENT TAKEN AT THE RANDOM OF FREE AND VOLUNTARY HUMANS, ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA (1867-1982).
The following is a true copy, with the exception of a few spelling corrections, of the Legal, Legitimate and Constitutional Judgment of its Own Law of the High Court of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada.
This Judgment is valid for all: Download the PDF file (click here)
CANADA
TRIBUNAL OF THE GREAT JURY OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA Releases the full judgment dated November 7, 2015
"Common Law Court / Customary Law"
Members of the Tribunal: Jean Paquet ...
This Judgment is valid for all: Download the PDF file (click here)
Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers
Courage Truth-Justice
English translation is coming soon.
Judgement In Supreme Court Of Canada
Default Judgement of the Supreme Court Of Canada December 2016
(click on the title above to view the original full sentence)
THE CURRENT JUDGMENT IS THE ONE THAT WAS OBTAINED BY DEFAULT IN DECEMBER 2016, TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, THE APPLICANTS ACTING ON THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA (1867-1982).
Below are the letters of initiation and the response of the Supreme Court of Canada:
Monday, August 8, 2016
To the Information Officer
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0J1
BY FAX
613-996-9138
File: 37104
EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES
EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY
ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER
UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN
To the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada
On October 17, 2015, the People's Grand Jury of Canada delivers its Judgment. The Grand Jury is legal, legitimate and constitutional. The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada to which all other legal provisions must conform.
Five months later ... a judgment of the Quebec court dated March 22, 2016 was declared on appeal by me, on the 30 day deadline, April 21, 2016. Proof of service. So, as long as the file is filed on the appeal, everything must stop: the other instances, seizures, threats, intimidation, harassment ...
The judgment that came out of this proceeding was June 6, 2016. I had 30 days therefore, until July 6, 2016, to register with the Supreme Court with this judgment of the Court of Appeal. What was done with the introductory motion on June 27, 2016 and the injunction filed on July 4, 2016, still on time, all the evidence in support.
When we went ourselves to file the introductory motion to the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016, I told the registry officer "we will seize our lands, our maple syrup and our property" . The agent replied: "make an injunction" , informing me that everything must stop from the date of filing of the injunction.
But the Court of Quebec orders the bailiff to give us a notice of seizure, a writ that the bailiff came to bring to us on July 5, 2016. Therefore, the Quebec court contravenes the rules to stop the prosecution and does not respect the deadlines. , the deadline is July 6, 2016. Moreover, the judgment of the Quebec court has been appealed, everything must stop.
On July 12th, 2 bailiffs arrive at our place accompanied by 2 police officers to take an inventory of our properties which will be listed for the seizure and auction, the sale, scheduled for September 1, 2016. The bailiffs advise me that I will receive a notice within 10 days to oppose. I received nothing, except a phone message to give me 3 options, that's all, nothing written, under which law either ...
I remind you that the motion for an injunction was filed on July 4, 2016 and that the mis en cause had 10 days to dismiss it. No objection has been filed so the injunction is valid since July 4, 2016, day of its filing.
Everything that happened after July 4, 2016, the writ of seizure on July 5, the bailiffs on July 12, the court of appeal on August 1 and the seizure scheduled for September 1, is illegal, illegitimate, unconstitutional and criminal. . It is the injunction that is predominant, which must be executed.
The Supreme Court does not answer me, does not want to interfere and does not want to confirm anything for me ... why? Does she want to ignore me and eliminate me too? Rest assured that your 1951 judgment is the main proof of this whole debate. The Supreme Court recognizes the Constitution of Canada, the BNA Act, 1867, the supreme law of Canada to which all other legal provisions must conform.
Therefore, a special emergency hearing must be scheduled for us at the Supreme Court of Canada as soon as possible, especially before the seizure of September 1, 2016, which will take away all of our equipment and machinery for our work at the cedrière, our equipment in Canada. the production of our maple syrup at the sugar shack, our native lives.
The Supreme Court must settle this case and stop all this mental cruelty that is the treason of the Constitution of Canada, the AANB, 1867, by the national state of Quebec.
Angèle Prince
609 Route 116 East
Princeville, Canada G6L 4K6
819-364-3253
EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES
EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY
ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER
UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN
Thursday, August 25, 2016
To the Information Officer
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0J1
BY FAX-613-996-9138
File: 37104
Subject: Default judgment of 17 August 2016
EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES
EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY
ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER
UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN
To the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada
The Constitution of Canada does not belong to either the Parliament of Canada or the provincial legislatures; it belongs to the country and it is in it that the citizens of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are entitled.
Who protects us? We have no protection whatsoever.
The Supreme Court of Canada accepted - filed, the default judgment of August 17, 2016 because it had to do so. There was no opposition to the injunctions received at the registry on 4 July 2016. Nobody objected within 10 days, therefore: mandatory, valid and executive default judgment on 17 August 2016.
This is commonly done in the national state of Quebec ...
Bailiffs are calling to the Supreme Court, taunting me. The Montreal RCMP tells me it's not federal. What do you tell them about these people whose laws are not valid? To those people who manage and govern illegally? What does the Supreme Court tell me in my back?
I give you until tomorrow Friday, August 26, 2016, 3:00 pm to email me a letter signed by one of the 6 judges who are not from Quebec to confirm that the Default Judgment is valid, applicable and executive as of August 17, 2016. That the Supreme Court has the duty and obligation to respect the Constitution of Canada, the AANB 1867, the Grand Jury and the Judgment of the Grand Jury of October 17, 2015, which falls under it. And above all, that the immediate stops are respected.
The Constitution of Canada is the "supreme law of Canada" to which all other legal provisions must conform.
Otherwise, I will be at 301 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Monday, August 29, 2016 in the morning to pick up this confirmation myself, because we have no time to lose before September 1st.
Angèle Prince
609 Route 116 East
Princeville, Canada G6L 4K6
819-364-3253
EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES
EMERGENCY UNDER EMERGENCY
ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER
UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN
BY RECOMMENDED SHIPPING
To the judges of the Supreme Court of Canada
EXTRAORDINARY REMEDY IN EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE TO PERSON IN DANGER UNDER THE LAW OF GOOD SAMARITAN Madam Justice Beverley McLachlin Although the Supreme Court of Canada does not give me a file number even after having followed all the procedures and filed all the required documents, the Supreme Court has the obligation to respect its own Judgment of 1951 which states:
"The Constitution of Canada belongs neither to the Parliament of Canada nor to the provincial legislatures, it belongs to the country and it is in it that the citizens of the country will find the protection of the rights to which they are entitled." We are citizens of the country. The Supreme Court of Canada has the obligation to respect and execute the judgment of the Grand Jury of the People of Canada of October 17, 2015, by the people for the people, which Tribunal is legal, legitimate and constitutional. "The Constitution of Canada is the
"Supreme Law of Canada" to which any other law must conform. " Message from the Minister of Justice Canada and Attorney General of Canada, Ms. Jody Wilson-Raybould, July 8, 2016: "our judicial system is essentially based on the constitutional principle" The Supreme Court of Canada has the obligation: To cancel immediately all the proceedings of a judgment of the superior court of Quebec no. 415-17-001091-143, brought in appeal which must be heard on August 1, 2016 to the court of appeal of Quebec bearing the number 200-09-009287- 167. Immediately release our bank account frozen since July 5, 2016 from any seizure imposed by a judgment of the Quebec Court no. 415-22-006478-147, within the required time, does illegally, all evidence to the support; OF immediately cancel the seizure of all our property that must be executed on September 1, 2016; Immediately cancel all the lawsuits coming from the Federation of Quebec Maple Syrup Producers that harass us relentlessly and who are about to seize our Indian lands, our maple syrup, too, illegally; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . immediately cancel all the lawsuits from the Federation of Quebec Maple Syrup Producers who are constantly harassing us and who are about to seize our Indian lands, our maple syrup, too, illegally; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . immediately cancel all the lawsuits from the Federation of Quebec Maple Syrup Producers who are constantly harassing us and who are about to seize our Indian lands, our maple syrup, too, illegally; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . maple, too, in all illegality; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it . maple, too, in all illegality; Immediately release us from all the harassment and threats illegally imposed on us by section 2 of the Canadian Constitution: freedom of association. We are forced to seize and bankrupt and we have the right and the power to stop all these provocations, by written confirmation in the shortest possible time, you have until July 29, 2016, deadline for us to receive it .
It's your only chance to escape. Angèle Prince 609 Route 116 East Princeville, Canada G6L 4K6 819-364-3253
Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers
Courage Truth-Justice
VIDEO PRESENTATIONS OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
These YouTube channels host the public hearings held by the Tribunal
However, for more mental comfort you can look in chronological order, by day, below:
NOTA BENE: some sequences of less than two minutes have not been published, have however been preserved in archives, and broadcast live.
CALENDAR OF THE GRAND JURY TRIBUNAL OF THE PEOPLE OF CANADA:
Preparatory or subsequent meetings
DAY 1 - SEPTEMBER 19, 2015:
DAY 2 - SEPTEMBER 20, 2015:
DAY 3 - 3 OCTOBER 2015:
DAY 4 - 17 OCTOBER 2015:
Special collaboration of JacquesDesrosiers
Courage Truth-Justice
Learn More
These two YouTube channels host the public hearings held by the Tribunal, but the sequences are not published in the order. So it's very difficult to follow all Tribunal hearings on these channels.
Annonce officielle / Official announcement
Formation of the Quebec Provincial Legislative council
The dejure Province of Quebec is announcing the official formation of the legislative council for the 1st time since 1968.
Formation du Conseil Législatif pour la Province de Québec
La Province de Québec dejure annonce officiellement la formation du Conseil Législatif pour la première fois depuis 1968.
Sessions
The legislative council is already in session, reviewing laws made the the illegal ''national assembly'' and will post their conclusions in public as soon as possible.
En session
Le conseil législatif est en session, révisant les lois émisses par l'assemblée nationale illégale et publiera ses conclusions dès que possible.